• 20Jul


    Will over at IntoMobile
    has some sad news for Palm, Sprint, and their investors: Some 40% of all Palm Pre smartphones sold to date - and they've all been sold with Sprint contracts - have been returned by unhappy owners. 40% is, like, almost half. Ouch.

    Okay, it's not really Will's news - he reported on some analyst's estimate - but if this is true it's a big shot of buzzkill in the arm of Palm and Sprint's comeback. IntoMobile and said analyst - Kevin Dede - point to hardware defects as the main cause for returns, though Will also mentions a recent survey in which Pre owners confess they wish there was a way to enter text while using the Web browser in landscape mode. Like, y'know, a soft QWERTY board or something.

    All of this Pre talk led me to a few of my own observations on the odd way in which said comeback has been staged thus far:

    1. Palm launched the Pre and WebOS with a hugely media friendly press conference at CES in January
    2. Palm then refused to let media and analysts handle Pre at any trade shows or events over the next six months
    3. Palm and Sprint really didn't do very much advertising of Pre in the weeks leading up to and following its launch. Think about it - I saw a few full page ads in national newspapers, sure, but where were the TV spots? I saw a few Sprint ads with a Pre or two in them, but they were ads for "The Now Network," and not for Pre itself.
    4. Now that Pre's been out for a few weeks, Palm's running a series of much maligned ads that promise abstractions like serenity while confusing viewers used to Apple's straightforward, "Want some shrimp? There's an app for that" approach. Sprint says the ads are reaching would-be customers in key demographics. The media - well, okay, the blogosphere - says otherwise:

    "New Palm Pre TV Ad is Quiet. A Little too Quiet" - J Robitaille, PreCentral

    "New Palm Pre TV ad doubles as sleeping aid" - W Park, IntoMobile

    "This stoned-out-of-her-mind Canadian actress Tamara Hope talking about flow for 30 seconds makes this Palm Pre ad more like a tampon ad instead of a cellphone commercial." - J Chen, Gizmodo

    I just ... I don't get it.  Frankly, I don't get most of Sprint's ads, anyway, but why in the world is Palm taking the wacky esoteric route? They have a killer product, a killer platform, and - dare I say it - an ex-Apple guy who seems to have instilled an Apple-esque control over buzz-making and media ops in his PR and marketing staffs. That's a good thing, by the way, even if as a blogger/journalist it ticks me off from time to time.

    So why the near radio silence followed by a string of bizarro-land ads that seem aimed at the same people who actually care that Pre's industrial design was "inspired by a river stone." That's all of four people, if you're counting along at home. Palm should drop with the nonsense and unleash a fury of to the point, butt kicking ads that make salient points that consumer tech buying Americans can digest and remember.

    Like what? Glad you asked:

    • Palm Pre: A smartphone that lets you send picture messages. We're looking at you, iPhone.
    • Palm Pre: Email, texting, Facebook and the Web. All at the same time. iPhone can't do that.
    • Palm Pre: The smartest phone on the planet. And the prettiest and easiest to use, too.
    • Palm Pre: You send messages with your phone, so don't you deserve a real keyboard? iPhone doesn't have one.
    • Palm Pre: You want to find some shrimp? There's an app for that. It's called cell phone service that doesn't suck, AT&T.
    • Palm Pre: The only phone in the world you can charge without wires. Seriously - isn't that cool?

    I'm just gettin' warmed up. I'm not saying any of the above are brilliant, and I'm not saying that they're all inarguable. But at least people can understand the messages, and at least the messages are designed to make those people want the damn phone. And that's not even touching upon the fact that Palm's Pre ads and Sprint's Pre ads are so disparate that I can only guess that the two companies are not enjoying the warmest and fuzziest of relationships right about now.

    Want more? Adrian at Gizmodo has a list of 23 software fixes/upgrades Palm should push out to Pre owners. Now. It's a good read.


    Tags: , , ,

  • 20Jul


    In light of the BlackBerry Tour launch, Verizon has lowered the price of the BlackBerry Storm to $99.99 after a $100 instant online discount, with a new two-year agreement.  Good news for those that want a BlackBerry at a low cost, and aren't waiting for the Storm 2 to launch later this year.  Anyone planning on picking one up?


    Source: BGR


    Tags: , , ,

  • 20Jul

     

    Samsung sent me the T-Mobile Highlight last week, and I have to say I've really been enjoying testing it out. Highlight stands out, at least just a little bit, in a world of mobile phones that all too often feels like, "Been there, seen that, done that, texted on that."

    Highlight is the third phone I've seen this summer that features a full touchscreen, a full-featured non-smartphone operating system, and a smaller than expected form factor. Why a tricked out non smartphone with a smaller than huge touchscreen? Because women buy phones, too, silly.

    And no, I can't tell you what the other two phones are. Not yet, anyway.

    You don't have to be a woman to dig Highlight, and it's not overtly being marketed only to the fairer sex. Highlight's size makes for easy one-handed operation and great pocketability, if that's a word, and its styling and color schemes (mine is the orange and red "Fire" variant) give it an eye-catching look. Yes, there's definitely something meant to be appealing to women in this phone's overall look/feel and combination of rounded corners and fingernail-friendly resistive touchscreen (iPhones, G1s and Pres don't play nicely with nails), but I can see guys getting into Highlight, too.

    Samsung's done well to up the quality of their resistive touchscreens in the latest batch I've gotten to check out (yes, including a few I can't yet tell you about). I do think we'll eventually see resistive touch go the way of the dinosaur in favor of all-capacitive lineups, but a number of factors still stand between here and there. In the meantime, Highlight is easier, nicer, and altogether better to tap and scroll on than recent Samsung models like Memoir, Behold, Eternity, and Impression.

    You also get a slightly updated TouchWiz experience on Highlight, TouchWiz being Samsung's user interface that provides a hide-able tray of widgets that can be customized and stocked full by individual carriers and dragged and dropped by users onto their home screens. Highlight includes a new T-Mobile Web2Go widget that provides RSS-style headlines from a handful of pre-chosen Websites (news, sports, entertainment, etc.). Phone geeks will scoff at the canned content, but mainstream consumers will likely enjoy the nicely formatted, easily digestible homescreen info. Phone geeks already skipped this paragraph, anyway, because Samsung's promising TouchWiz 2.0 hasn't shipped yet.

    That said, TouchWiz isn't my favorite OS, and you really can only drag one or two widgets onto the home screen before things become a jumbled mess. Highlight has a decent full HTML web browser, and the virtual QWERTY board works pretty well in widescreen mode, but it's no iPhone/Pre/G1. Also, where's the headphone jack?

    Not everyone wants the size, feature overload, or expense of a flagship smartphone. That's why carriers stock their lineups with the enV Touches (Verizon), Eternities (AT&T), and Highlights of the mobile world. Samsung and T-Mo did a nice job with this one, save for one critical factor: Price.

    $149 is way too high a price tag for this phone, especially when a you-know-what-3G can be had on AT&T for $99 on contract, and the more fully featured Behold (with its 5 megapixel camera) is only $129 on T-Mo and the even snazzier Memoir is a scant $49.99 when purchased via LetsTalk (a PhoneDog partner).

    Drop the price on Highlight to $79 or $49 on contract and T-Mobile could have a winner on its hands, especially with women and teens who don't need a full-on smartphone. Even if T-Mo doesn't do it for us, I'm sure LetsTalk or some other online retailer will discount Highlight before too long. As it is now, however, Highlight is a neat, but overpriced/underpowered feature phone at $149.


    Tags: , , ,

  • 20Jul
    Got iPhone 3.0? Then check out Google's search function using its new My Location feature. It's available via Safari, which zeros in on a user's area to deliver relevant local results, like nearby bars, restaurants or weather data.



    Though it works practically anywhere, the searches seem to offer more value if you're in a major metropolitan area. Small towns without a lot of business presence online may not yield a lot of website results — just contact listings. (That's certainly not Google's fault. It just takes awhile for some regional mom-and-pop shops to step into the 21st century.) Even so, when all you need is an address and phone number, it's still a handy tool to have in your pocket.

    To give it a go, launch Safari and go to Google. Once there, you can turn on My Location, which will send up screen nags asking you if the app can use your location. Click "Allow", and you're good to go. When you need to change your location, just hit the "Update" link on the main Google page.

    Not interested in My Location? That's cool. Shutting it off is pretty easy. On Google.com, hit the "Preferences" link and click on the "No" radio button under "Allow use of device location?" (If you'd rather spare your battery and don't need location-aware services on your phone at all, you can set your location prefs to "OFF" under "Settings," then "General.")

    For now, Google Search with My Location for iPhone 3.0 is available only in the US and the UK.

    [Google Mobile Blog via UnwiredView.com]



    Tags: , , ,

  • 20Jul



    OVERVIEW

    What's good: One phone number for all phones, online access to received voice mails and SMS texts, ability to switch between lines during a call, one-button recording of incoming calls, vm transcription, ability to receive vm notification via email/SMS, vm transcripts/mp3s can be forwarded via email, ability to send SMS out via browser, customizable outgoing messages for different callers, auto-scheduling to ring different phones depending on time or day, call screening, totally free service.

    What's bad: Cumbersome to get Google Voice number to show up in recipients' caller IDs or SMS texts, transcription of voice mails is less-than-great, online or cellular hiccups means calls sometimes don't connect to the handset (going straight to vm instead), 25-second delay before vm picks up can't be changed.


    INTRODUCTION
    Google Voice was born out of Google's 2007 acquisition of an Internet telephony company called GrandCentral. Like the old service, the crux of the new service is to combine all of a user's modes of phone communication into a single number/account. When callers dial a GV number, the user's predetermined set of phones ring — whether that's home, office, cell or vacation bungalow.

    Now that Google Voice has opened up for public invitations, it looks like the company is prepping for a flood of interest. Not only did it just add the ability for users to change their GV phone number, which will no doubt please plenty of users, but I also heard stories that the company acquired over a million new phone numbers. And there are rumors that number portability is on the way, which will really help the service take off. Being able to move an existing phone number to GV would be really sweet, and tempt more fence sitters to at least give the service a try.

    A little over a month ago, the PR team at Google hooked me up with a Google Voice account, so I could take it for a test spin. So I set it up with my cell and my home phone, and sat back to enjoy the cellular Google-osity. The resulting experience has caused alternating feelings of joy and frustration ever since.


    DESIGN & FEATURES
    The user interface of GV's online account is consistent with the rest of the Google infrastructure, so it's easy to use and very search-centric.

    The service is powerful, simple to use, and loaded with features, like:

    •Voice mail transcription
    •Free SMS: send outgoing texts via web and have incoming messages delivered to GV account
    •Free outbound calls via GV online account
    •Free conference calling (and cheap international calls)
    •Unified vm and SMS messages via online account access (also allows making outbound calls or texts online)
    •Message notifications to email or SMS
    •Support for switching phones in the middle of a call
    •Recording calls (incoming only)
    •Playback of recorded calls and voicemails directly in the browser or via MP3 download
    •Simple scheduling process to control when calls are routed to specific numbers. (For example, it could be configured to direct calls to a work phone during the day, to a home phone in the evenings and cell phone on weekends.)
    •Google address book integration and import feature, to sync other major contact formats, like CSV or vCards.
    •Customizable greetings or forwarding phone destinations based on contact group.
    •Call screening via its ListenIn feature. (Users can hear a incoming voicemail in progress and pick up the call by pressing a key.)



    Voicemail transcription is a useful feature to have. The accuracy does need a lot of work, though, but given the fact that it's free (and that it often gets at least the important parts right, like phone numbers), it's better to have it than not. The transcripts are also searchable, which will definitely have more of a WOW factor when the quality improves. GV can also forward voicemail transcripts to e-mail, and notify you of new vm or SMS messages via e-mail or text.

    GV also integrates with Google address book and supports vCards and CSV files (for Apple Mail, Outlook, Yahoo! Mail and others), so loading up contacts is a snap. Even better, once you have contacts in there, you can customize outgoing vm messages by group. Everyone in your "work" group can hear a professional "Please leave a message" recording, while the "friends" group can still enjoy your rendition of "Pokerface."  

    And, as you would expect of a calling service, voicemails are accessible from any phone or online. The account interface is familiar — threaded and easy on the eyes, just like the GMail interface we all know and love.


    USABILITY & PERFORMANCE
    When it comes to Google Voice, the magic really happens when people contact you. That's when the voice mail options, notification features, call screening, etc, can really knock your socks off. I also love the ability to set different outgoing messages for friends vs. work colleagues.

    I don't have an unlimited texting plan, so being able to send free SMS texts from the web was pretty neat.



    Placing phone calls online from the GV account was also fast, simple and free. (Basically, you plug in your contact's info and the number where you can be reached — home, work, Aunt Stella's, wherever — and it rings you there, then connects the call to the other person.)



    Call routing worked well; generally, although I sometimes experienced dropped calls and the random, unexpected GV voice mail (despite the fact that my phone was on when the call came in, but didn't ring). Also, there was less-than-spectacular call quality on occasion. It wasn't consistent enough to make me drop the service altogether, but it did get frustrating at times.

    Incoming SMS messages were also an issue. Texters' contact info showed up as 101010000x, instead of the friend's name or number. Thankfully, the number was pretty consistent for each individual, so adding those numbers to friends' entries in my address book helped. Yeah, it's a bit of a hassle, but at least their names show up now.

    As for using the service to call out from your cell or landline phone — so friends' caller IDs display your GV number — well, that's also tricky. To make the caller ID consistent, you have to dial your GV number, press 2, and then punch in the number of the contact you want to call.

    It wouldn't have been any big deal if I'd memorized my friends' digits, but I didn't, and there's no option to directly use my phone's built-in addressbook with this service. So I had to look up their info, write it down, dial GV, go through the prompt, and then manually input the number. Needless to say, thanks to the klunkiness of this process, I didn't make many outgoing calls through the service initially.

    Thankfully, there's a third-party iPhone app for GV. This makes the process A LOT easier. Now I can just use my phone's addressbook, and the app just automates the dialing-out process. That's pretty sweet. (Google is launching its own new apps for Android and BlackBerry, with a Google-created iPhone app on the way. More on that below.**) If you're using GV with a cell phone, having one of these apps is crucial.

    What also got complicated was routing callers to different voice mailboxes — my iPhone's or the GV account — as needed. (I like having immediate and direct access to urgent messages from family or important business contacts, so I wanted the visual voice mails right on my phone. But friends calling to chit chat? Telemarketing calls? Courtesy calls from my bank? These can all go to my GV account, for me to peruse at my leisure.) Here's the issue, though: You can't change the time or number of rings before GV voice mail picks up, so if it's set earlier than your phone's allotted time, then callers will always go to GV's mailbox. (The set time is 25 seconds.)

    With no option to change that, I wound up having to call AT&T and asking them make its voice mail kick in earlier than 25 seconds. (Later, I found out that there's a hack for this that's configurable directly on the iPhone.)

    As for advanced features, it's kind of disappointing that call recording — an extremely desired feature for many users — doesn't work on outgoing calls, at least for the time being. I guess the fact that it's offered at all is terrific, but it seems strange that this limitation exists. (If you can record inbound calls, you should be able to record in the other direction, right? Even old-fashioned answering machines were able to do that.)

    In truth, there is so much packed into this service, I'd need several posts' worth of space (or a small book deal) to cover it all. But these were the major issues that came up over the course of a month and a half.


    CONCLUSION
    Google Voice — which is now finally out of beta is off to a great start. It's not perfect, obviously, but all in all, what worked well actually worked really well. And what didn't, in most cases, was somewhat "tweakable," (except for vm transcription accuracy, which the company will hopefully improve on its own over time).

    As good as it is, the service has the potential to get a lot more interesting if Google integrates it directly into its Android OS (without having to rely on add-on apps). But even if you're not an Android fan, it's still a pretty decent service to check out.

    Be warned, however, that it's not quite operating at "set it and forget it" levels yet. For that reason, I'll probably stick to personal use for my GV number. When it comes to the all-important business communications — well, I'm not sure it's quite ready for prime time yet.





    **A WORD ABOUT MOBILE PHONE APPS FOR GV:
    A couple of people have asked me about the Google cell phone apps for GV. The iPhone app I use, GV Mobile ($2.99), is a third-party program created by Sean Kovacs, and it has worked really well so far. Google also plans to release its own free dialer app for the iPhone.

    In addition, the company released official GV dialer apps for BlackBerry and Android devices. David Pogue, from The New York Times, recently summed them up thusly:

    "If I call you from this little free app, then you see my Google Voice number on your Caller ID, not my phone's birth number.

    On the BlackBerry, this is a slight hassle, since you can't use the built-in dialing methods (like dialing from your address book). You have to open the Google Voice app first.

    On the Android version, life is much better. Your Google Voice number is transmitted no matter how you place a call. (No wonder it's so much better integrated: Google is also the creator of the Android cell phone software)...

    ...These new Google Voice dialers work by contacting a local Google Voice access number, which relays your dialed number from there. In fact, you see the local access number ("now calling") on your screen when you place a call."


    Pogue also makes some good points about friends-and-family circles and free in-network calling: T-mobile subscribers could designate their own GV numbers as one of the Fave Five, thereby making all those calls free without limit. But if you have free in-network calling with, say, Verizon, then dialing your (out-of-network) GV number to call people isn't free — even if the recipient is in your network.

    But the apps do offer a well-designed UI for everything from transcriptions, logs and texts, to direct access for making cheap international calls. And again, it makes the dialing-out process so much simpler.

    For more, hit up Aaron's post here or stay tuned for an upcoming vid from John on the Android app.



    Tags: , , ,

  • 20Jul
    Observing device launches has always intrigued me.  In my opinion, the method in which a carrier launches a device lends credence to their dedication to the device - short-term and long-term.  Having been in the industry for years, I've seen well-managed launches (Palm Pre, iPhone 3GS), and poorly managed (iPhone 3G 2008) launches.  In 90 percent of the scenarios, the failure has centered around a general lack of preparedness - be it a lack of marketing, inventory, purchasing fluidity, or all of the above.

    The BlackBerry Tour has been on retail shelves for eight days, and in that short period of time, we've seen some interesting things.  I certainly wasn't excluded from them; as many of you know, I'm using the Verizon BlackBerry Tour as one of my personal devices.  I purchased mine on launch day, and the first one was plagued with a trackball issue out of the box.  When scrolling from left to right, the trackball would lag, making for a frustrating experience.  Within the hour, I had exchanged it for a different Tour, and have had no problems with the new phone.  Chalk it up to the fact that Verizon had around 317,600 Tour's available at launch, but most can agree that Big Red's launch was relatively smooth.

    The Sprint launch, on the other hand, was a bit different.  Lending credence to the claim that Sprint's BlackBerry Tour debut was a "on paper only" launch intended to match Verizon's date, the device was backordered shortly after midnight on the 12th.  In a strange twist of events, many customers that ordered the device in the first few minutes of launch were, in many cases, the last individuals to receive their device.  In a rare move, Sprint even acknowledged the issue:

    "We have experienced strong demand for the Blackberry Tour which has placed your order, or a portion of your order, in backorder status. While every attempt is made to fulfill orders first in and first out, a system issue earlier in the week resulted in some orders being shipped out of sequence. Our shipping commitment for the Tour remains 5 to 8 business days based on date of order..."

    Needless to say, frustration erupted all over the internet.  From shipping, to activation, to issues with build quality, reports were popping up everywhere.  I haven't had any issues with my second unit, but reported problems have ranged from lag, to OS freezes, to loose battery doors; as this article was going to press, Crackberry's "Tour Problems?" thread was 37 pages long, with 552 posts.  Admittedly, I was one of the individuals that, at first, thought a vast majority of the issues were people trying to find something to complain about.  After all, the device is brand new, and bugs are to be expected out of anything fresh out of the factory.  Or are they?

    It's no secret that I am an avid fan of RIM and the BlackBerry product.  So, when I see a 37 page problem thread, it concerns me.  Are these meaningless problems, invented by users just to gripe, or are they legitimate complaints?  Or both?  Is it fair to look at the Tour as if it's the only device to ever have issues at launch?  The Storm, Bold, and Curve 8900 - the latest RIM devices - have all had launch issues of their own.  Moreover, what device doesn't have problems at launch?  I'm not arguing that they should be accepted by any means, but find any flagship device - Pre, iPhone, Storm - and they've all had (or continue to have) quirks.  At their core, they're all mini-computers, and as such, issues happen.

    Furthermore, it's all part of a larger issue - how does it reflect upon Research In Motion and their devices?  Let's face it, the average consumer isn't going to walk into a Sprint store, and when they can't get their Tour to activate properly, say "well darn, Ensemble isn't accepting the Tour's ESN/MEID for some reason.  I'll try again later."  No!  They're going to blame Sprint, RIM, or both.

    I say all of this out of a desire to hear from you.  Let's have a conversation.  Whether you purchased the Tour, or you didn't; whether you're having issues, or not - I want to hear from you.  I want to get a sense of what everyone thinks about the whole ordeal - the launch, the bugs, the phone, the carrier support...everything.  I plan to actively respond via my Twitter feed and the comments section below, because I want to see what you think.  Let the discussion begin!



    Tags: , , ,

  • 20Jul


    I complain about this a lot. So do other people. Today I'll try to stick mainly to citing others' complaints, with only a hint of my own kvetching.

    TechCrunch's MG Siegler went on a rant today about his iPhone's Visual Voicemail being down. For two weeks. Without any notice from AT&T. That's worth mentioning for a few reasons:

    1. You can't get voicemail on a (locked on AT&T) iPhone unless it's visual
    2. A cell phone without voicemail is not nearly so useful as a cell phone with voicemail
    3. MG is apparently far from the only person who's been missing voicemail on his iPhone as of late

    As Siegler wrote:

    In my mind, the most recent AT&T failure is completely inexcusable. Its visual voicemail system — which is the In my mind, the most recent AT&T failure is completely inexcusable. Its visual voicemail system — which is the only way to be notified of voicemails on the iPhone — has been down for many users for days, if not weeks. And AT&T apparently didn't bother to tell anyone. What does this mean? Thousands, or hundreds of thousands or maybe even millions of missed connections, that could be vital for personal lives, business and a host of other things. I'm simply dumbfounded by the failure.

    I personally am in a down-cycle of AT&T-inspired anger, but only because my latest up-cycle peaked about two weeks ago. As some of you know, I bought an iPhone 3GS on launch day and am paying for service with my very own money, as Apple didn't get me a review unit.

    I called AT&T two weeks ago to complain about the utterly terrible service my wife and I had been experiencing (we have a two-line family plan), including the fact that neither one of us had been able to send or receive text messages for several days. AT&T fessed up to accidentally turning SMS service off for the entire account, and to the fact that several 3G towers in our area were down (which, according to Molly Wood, is still the case). I wound up with a $90 credit on my account, but the service hasn't gotten any better.


    Siegler's advice about the situation is two-fold:

    1. Don't buy an iPhone:
    I often get asked by people if I think they should get one now or wait to see if it ever gets on another carrier. That answer becomes easier everyday: If you can, wait.

    2. Apple should ditch AT&T just as fast as they can:
    AT&T's exclusive deal with Apple is set to expire next year, and they're trying to extend it right now. I will say right now that if Apple does re-up with AT&T it will easily be one of the most disappointing things it has ever done. And I think ultimately that would prove to be a huge blunder from a business perspective.

    He then conjures up that most precious of mythical beasts, the Verizon iPhone, going so far as to say:

    The iPhone will eventually be on Verizon, on Apple's terms. It's just a question of when.

    If it's not next year, will I consider switching carriers and getting another phone? Yes.

    If that's by the end of next year, many of us will be happy campers. I don't care what I have to pay to break an AT&T contract, I will do so in a heartbeat.

    You know what? I'm almost in concurrence (which is a rare thign for me to be with a TechCrunch article). I'm not so sure that a Verizon iPhone will work out as well as everyone assumes it would, if it ever happens. But I would advise would-be iPhone buyers to consider other carriers and options before signing up with AT&T. Especially if they live and work near where I live and work.

    AT&T service is and has been a joke around these, the San Francisco Bay Area, parts. Period. And even if it's better where you live and work, you can't do MMS or tethering on that iPhone 3GS yet, now can you?

    I'm a big fan of iPhone's hardware and software. But others are catching up, and as soon as I get that HTC Hero to call my own for a week, I may be rewriting that sentence to read, "but at least one other has passed it." Apple didn't really do much with iPhone OS 3.0 to match what Palm and Google, in particular, have been doing with their mobile platforms, and to say that Pre on Sprint outperformed iPhone on AT&T when I tested it last month would be an understatement.

    Thing is, I can't in good faith recommend Pre to everyone who asks because it lacks things I use everyday, like an RSS feeder and widescreen keyboard. And my review unit was plagued by terrible battery life (though that has changed at least some in the past month). T-Mobile's myTouch 3G looked really nice when I saw it last week, but it lacks a 3.5mm audio jack which, for me, is a deal-breaker. So what should I - or we - do in the meantime, while we wait for a better iPhone alternative to emerge and/or mature?

    According to Siegler, you're lookin' at it right now:

    Let's all do what we can to ensure that happens — to ensure Apple gets the message. Every time there is one of these ridiculous AT&T failures, tweet about it, blog about it, write Apple about it, or scream about it. Do whatever you can, but don't just sit there and take it any more.

     It's time to send a message, since AT&T can't provide us with ours with any sort of reliability.

    Message sent. AT&T, are you listening?

     


    Tags: , , ,

  • 20Jul

    I'll give credit where it's due - to data, Palm has done a good job of releasing steady software updates as needed to the Palm Pre.  Rumored for a release "on or near 7/22/09" according to "bigchico68" on SprintUsers forums, changes include a removal of the demo software, synchronization of Facebook friends with a PC, the addition of emoticons in text messages, and the ability to start a YouTube search by hitting the enter key. 

    Nothing earth shattering by any means, but certainly small steps to make the phone better - and furthermore, evidence that Palm is doing its very best to make its flagship device the best it can be.  Keep up the good work, Palm.

    Source: PhoneArena


    Tags: , , ,

  • 20Jul

     

    Could T-Mobile be looking at ways to turn its myFaves value calling plan into a mobile social network of sorts?  Maybe, say GigaOM and TmoNews.  This makes all sorts of sense while also sounding like a can of worms that might not be worth opening, given the fact that social networks are a dime a dozen these days - especially those not called "Facebook," "Hi5," or "twitter."

    I spied both Om and T-Mo USA CTO Cole Brodman at last week's MobileBeat 2009 conference, and so I can picture the following exchange going down in the hotel foyer:

    Om: Tell me about myFaves
    Cole "It's going to be more than an economically optimized calling service, Brodman said. "I want it to be more than just voice," he said. "I want it to be a lens to our social networks."
    GigaOm reports that Brodman hopes his company will "do a social makeover of myFaves and push it aggressively to their customers in 2010."

    I'm guessing that right about then Cole, or one of his lackeys, arranged five breakfast pastries (or energy bars, if it was later in the day) on a table, gave Om a knowing look, and then picked one up  and plopped it in his mouth, saying, "MY fave!" as he chewed. Maybe not. But still, I wonder what "a social makeover of myFaves," might mean, and whether or not it's really a good idea. Hopefully he's really just thinking of copping the kinds of things that INQ and HTC and Palm are already doing in linking mobile contacts to their social networking profiles and statuses.


    Tags: , , ,

  • 20Jul

    Nokia X6 - New X Series from NokiaCurrently, Nokia have their numbered handsets, the 5800 and 6700 for example, plus their Eseries business handsets and their super-flash Nseries ‘multimedia computers’ as they prefer we call them.  Recently however, the Finnish company have applied for trademarks on not one but two new ’series’ designations - C and X.

    This could be mean many different things, from the rather exciting to the rather mundane.  Starting with the exciting possibilities, it could mean we are getting an entire new range of handsets from Nokia, along with the launch of their rumoured netbook range, all ready to be unveiled at Nokia World later in the year.

    The more mundane possibility is that their range of numbered phones are going to be renamed - Classic and XpressMusic are terms Nokia use frequently, and those marketing folk love brand synergy like this.  Of course, we’re hoping a simple re-branding exercise is not the case, so will be keeping an eye out for more from Nokia on this one!

    Post from Dial-a-Phone, UK's no. 1 for Mobile Phones.

    Tags: , , ,

« Previous Entries   

Recent Comments

  • Thanks for post. Nice to see such good ideas....
  • Nice post u have here :D Added to my RSS reader...
  • Hi there, I looked over your blog and it looks really goo...