• 22Jul

    HP CEO Mark Hurd

    HP's CEO Mark Hurd have been good for a few choice quotes ever since the company acquired Palm ("We didn't buy Palm to get into the smartphone business"), and today we've got another.  This one, however, isn't as bad for Palm as the ones in the past have been.  Speaking with German newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine, Hurd stated that the Palm brand won't end up getting killed, but would instead be "moved into the background," similar to the Pavilion or Envy lines of computers that HP manufactures.  Hurd then reiterated that "Palm is a software deal," but also mentioned phones, slates, and printers as possible destinations for webOS.

    Considering the strength of the Palm name, both recently with webOS and with past products, it's not a surprise that HP won't be doing away completely with the Palm brand.  It is kind of disappointing that Palm will become a "sub-brand" of HP, though, since Palm has done much better in the mobile space than HP ever has (remember the iPaq?).  As long as Palm continues to release new hardware and updated versions of webOS, though, I'll be happy.

    Via PreCentral, FAZ.net

    Become a PhoneDog Fan on Facebook and don't forget to "Spin to Win!" today Know something we don't? E-mail us or post it in our forums


    Tags: , , ,

  • 22Jul

    Jon Rubinstein

    We haven't heard much news from the HP/Palm camp since HP's acquisition of Palm was complete, but thanks to the Fortune Brainstorm Tech conference, there's a slew of webOS-related news.  Some of the biggest information from the conference came straight from Jon Rubinstein himself.  Speaking about webOS, Rubinstein said that webOS 2.0 is on track for a release "later this year."  There wasn't any other information concerning the update given, but considering that 2010 is halfway over at this point, hopefully the company has already made good progress on the update.

    It's good to see Palm working hard on webOS after the merger with HP.  We knew that webOS wouldn't be disappearing or anything like that, but it's always good to get confirmation from the higher ups.  Now it would be great to see some new webOS hardware to help revitalize interest in the platform.  We still have faith in webOS, but with so much time out of the limelight, I wouldn't be surprised to learn that the OS is slowly starting to fade from the minds of some in the mobile industry.

    Via Engadget

    Become a PhoneDog Fan on Facebook and don't forget to "Spin to Win!" today Know something we don't? E-mail us or post it in our forums


    Tags: , , ,

  • 22Jul


    Overview

    What's Good: Thin and light Android smartphone; fast 1 GHz processor; beautiful Super AMOLED display.

    What's Bad: Battery life is ok but not the greatest; lightweight body may be considered "cheap" by some.

    The Verdict: Despite a few flaws, the Samsung Vibrant is the best Android device on T-Mobile.

    Introduction

    While T-Mobile pioneered the Android "revolution" in the United States, the nation's fourth largest wireless carrier hasn't had a high-end, slate-like Android device until now.  Enter the Samsung Vibrant, a member of the Galaxy S series, and the one that most closely resembles the European Galaxy S design.  With a 1 GHz processor, 4-inch Super AMOLED display, and thin body, it's a feature packed phone - but does it hold its own amidst the flurry of summer phone launches?

    Design & Features

    The Vibrant ships with the battery, AC adapter, and USB cable (which doubles as the power cord), spare battery cover (purple), and instruction manuals.  Measuring in at 4.82 inches tall by 2.54 inches wide by 0.39 inch thick, and weighing 4.16 ounces, it's thin and light enough to stow in a bag, pocket, or purse.  With 16.7 million colors, the 4-inch Super AMOLED screen is absolutely beautiful.  The Vibrant comes pre-loaded with Avatar (more on that later), and the picture quality is absolutely beautiful.  Surprisingly enough, the screen isn't as bad in direct sunlight as the typical AMOLED display.

    The left side of the unit houses the volume rocker, and the right side has the power/lock button.  The top has the microUSB charging port and 3.5mm headphone jack.  For the most part, the device looks like a typical smartphone, but one of my favorite design elements on the device is the little "door" that covers the microUSB charging port on the top.  Instead of using the typical cover that most manufacturers use, it's a door that slides from left to right.  It's easy to use, and you don't have to worry about it falling off after prolonged use.



    When I saw the Galaxy S series for the first time at a Samsung event in New York City, my initial thought was "man, these phones feel cheap."  And there's no denying it - compared to the hard plastic, glass, and metal found on devices like the Nexus One, iPhone 4, EVO 4G, and Legend, the Vibrant is very plasticky.  As time went on, though, I found myself appreciating the build quality as lightweight and clean versus lightweight and cheap.  The Vibrant felt great in the hand, and the chrome accents give it a nice look.

    Usability & Performance

    Complete with Android 2.1, the Vibrant offers a modified version of Samsung's TouchWiz user interface.  I'm not a huge fan of the TouchWiz that is installed on the manufacturer's featurephones, but it's surprisingly functional on the Vibrant.  Like the iPhone 4, the Vibrant has a bottom "dock" that contains "Dialer," "Contacts," "Messaging," and "Applications" shortcuts.  There are seven individual pages to customize, and in a neat feature, Samsung allows you to re-arrange, add, and remove pages.  Similar to the myTouch 3G Slide interface, all icons are "boxed."  When I initially picked up the phone, I didn't care for the user interface.  After a few days, however, it grew on me.

    The Vibrant offers Samsung's 1 GHz Hummingbird processor, and in day-to-day use, the Vibrant is speedy.  Apps opened quickly, video loaded without a hitch, and I never experienced the occasional lag that other reviewers have discussed.  The phone ships with a few T-Mobile goodies like James Cameron's Avatar (full movie), MobiTV, Visual Voicemail, Telenav, and a shortcut to GoGo's in-flight Wi-Fi service.  The Super AMOLED display handles Avatar beautifully, and in a few minutes of watching it, I was more mesmerized than I was in theaters. 



    The Vibrant offers a 5.0-megapixel camera with autofocus, though it's absent of a flash.  Pictures taken during the day were rich and full of color, and thanks to the Vibrant's "night mode" pictures taken in low light were surprisingly decent.  That being said, I can see instances where the flash would have improved the overall quality of the photo, but after a few days of snapping pictures, I didn't miss the flash as much as I thought I would.  The camera takes decent pictures across the board, but after using the iPhone 4, EVO 4G, and Incredible, I was a bit spoiled.  The Vibrant offers 720p video recording, and video quality was quite good.



    I tested the Vibrant in the Charlotte metropolitan area, and call quality was impressive.  The earpiece on the device is incredibly loud, and could be one of the best I've tested in recent memory.  I have several phones on my desk, and in several occasions, I found myself using the Vibrant to call people instead of another devices.  When testing the device in a T-Mobile fringe area in Charlotte, I was able to hear the other caller, despite some choppiness and slight audio fading.  Speakerphone worked well, and I was able to pair two Bluetooth headsets to the device.



    With a 1500 mAh battery, the Vibrant offers 6.5 hours of talk time, and just under 18 days of standby time.  Given that it uses Android and has a large touchscreen, it's not going to make it through several days of heavy usage, but with moderate use including calling, text messaging, browsing the web, using apps, and use of the Android Market, I was able to make it through a full business day with the unit - it died at about 9:00 PM, 13 hours after I removed it from the charger.  The battery charges incredibly slow, though, so those that enjoy a quick charge in the car or in between meetings (read: me) may have to rethink their strategy.

    The Samsung Vibrant offers HSPA connectivity, so browsing speeds were very fast.  The full CNN webpage loaded in about 16 seconds, and the PhoneDog homepage loaded in 25 seconds. Other data-intensive tasks such as Google Maps, the Android Market, Google Talk, the Amazon MP3 store, and downloaded apps worked well.  Though the Vibrant doesn't support HSPA+ per-se, it does benefit from markets that have HSPA+.  At present, T-Mobile offers HSPA+ to 85 million people in 50 markets, with the goal of covering 185 million people by the end of 2010.

    Conclusion

    Despite some minor flaws like battery charging time and a "cheap" feel (for some), the Samsung Vibrant is the best Android device availble on T-Mobile.  At $200, the high-end device is a direct competitor to the DROID X, iPhone 4, EVO 4G, and Captivate, and it holds its own with a big Super AMOLED display, thin form factor, and speedy 1 GHz processor.  It's available now for $199.99, or $499.99 full retail at T-Mobile.

    Become a PhoneDog Fan on Facebook and don't forget to "Spin to Win!" today Know something we don't? E-mail us or post it in our forums


    Tags: , , ,

  • 22Jul

    iPhone 4 bumper refund

    At Apple's recent "Antennagate" press conference, the company announced that they would be handing out free bumpers to every iPhone 4 owner.  If someone had already bought a bumper, they would be refunded the purchase price.  Today we saw the first signs of Apple's plans in action, as a MacRumors forum member received notification that Apple has processed his refund.  MacRumors also expects Apple to make in-store refunds a possibility, although there are no details on that method just yet.

    It's great to see Apple reacting so quickly with the refunds, although an in-store option would be nice to see, also.  Still, some sort of refund is better than none at all.  I imagine we'll be hearing more cases like this one as customers continue to receive refunds as well as some free bumper cases.  Have any of you gotten a similar notification from Apple about a bumper refund?

    Via MacRumors

    Become a PhoneDog Fan on Facebook and don't forget to "Spin to Win!" today Know something we don't? E-mail us or post it in our forums


    Tags: , , ,

  • 22Jul

    Sprint's HTC Evo 4G and AT&T's Apple iPhone 4 both feature front-facing cameras that work with video calling software. Video chatting on the go is a hot new thing here in the states, but it's been a part of cell phone culture in other parts of the world for awhile now.

    When I first got an Evo 4G to test out, I did a video chat using Fring's app with Mobile Burn's Todd Haselton, who was also reviewing the device. We chatted over a 3G connection on Sprint's cellular network. I was in my office in California, Todd was at home in New York City. It was fun, the quality was better than expected but not pristine, and that was that.

    A month or so later, when I first got an iPhone 4, I did a video chat using Apple's FaceTime software with IntoMobile's Will Park. FaceTime only works over WiFi, but both will and I happened to be at WiFi-equipped bars that Friday during happy hour, so when I called him with my pint glass raised in the air from Oakland he answered in kind from Palo Alto, CA. Geeks drinking beer on a Friday, go figure (!). That call was also fun, and featured slightly more pristine video quality, but we couldn't hear one another due to the background noise.

    That second call made me wonder if "FaceTiming from bars" was set to be the new form of stupid public behavior - along the lines of clueless adults holding loud, public conversations on crowded trains and in movie theaters - that I'd soon grow to scoff at. While I had fun FaceTiming with Will while waiting for my friend to meet me, as soon as my real-world buddy showed up I felt really obnoxious for toasting virtual Will via video call from a real-world bar he wasn't at. I suddenly envisioned a world in which drunkards stopped screaming loudly at one another in public and instead took to screaming even more loudly at their video-chatting counterparts instead. And that made me sad.

    But the next Monday when WIll and I debriefed about our video chat, he asked a good question about the "new" tech: "Sure it's fun now in a gimimcky way, but in a month will anybody still be using it?"

    And so a month later (give or take), here's what I can tell you about video calling on mobile and on the desktop ... and what a few folks I know who live, breathe and work with mobile tech every day have to say on the topic:

    Noah Kravitz - Editor in Chief, PhoneDog Media (@phonedog_noah)

    "I use FaceTime here and there with Adriana and a few other iPhone 4-toting friends, but usually only for the "how's it work?" experience. I do, however, use Skype to video chat with my family on the East Coast and to conduct TV interviews. Video chatting works better on the desktop, in part because the screen is larger and in part because people tend to be stationary and within WiFi coverage when they're at their computers. Video calls on the go aren't particularly easy or fun to me, and not that many people in the US yet have a mobile phone that can handle it. Skype, on the other hand, is easy, free, and runs on the "plain old computers" that most people already own and use every day.

    I'll be very curious to see what happens to mobile video calling in the states if and when: 1. Apple releases a FaceTime-compatible iPod Touch this Fall, 2. More Android phones with front-facing cameras hit the market, and 3. Some clever developer releases a FaceTime-to-Desktop client that works really well, enabling iPhone 4 users to video chat with the rest of the world. Even then, I'm still thinking that teens might take to FaceTiming while the rest of us Skype, but only once in awhile."

    Adriana Lee - Managing Editor, Todays iPhone (@phonedogadriana)

    "I don't use FaceTime very often, but i could easily see my usage going up, and i think it will. My sister lives in Europe, my brother and nephews are in Jersey, and my folks are in Pennsylvania, sovideo chatting via Skype has already taken off in my homelife. We don't all have iPhone 4s, so I'm watching third parties like Fring very closely to see what cross-platform solutions might develop. i'm somewhat annoyed that Skype is no longer available via Fring, and that the Skype update didn't address mobile video calling. Thatwould solve a lot of problems for me."

    Aaron Baker - Managing Editor, PhoneDog.com (@phonedog_aaron)

    "I've used video chatting on an occasional basis, but I have no plans to increase my use in the short-term unless my friends and family migrate to devices that are capable of said technology. Video calling is an amazing tool, and even in the short time I've used it, I've found myself enjoying the face-to-face communication. That being said, the technology is available on a select number of smartphones in the United States, so I have a feeling it'll be a while before it's a truly "mainstream" feature."

    Will Park - Editor in Chief, IntoMobile (@willpark)

    "Video chatting on the mobile phone has been around for a long time, but it hasn't taken off in all these years for good reason. Nokia once said that the reason video calls have failed to catch on was because the up-facing angle makes people look ugly - and it does - but the real problem is that video chatting is just not convenient enough to use in real life. I used FaceTime on my iPhone 4 a few times during iPhone 4 launch weekend, and haven't touched it since - being limited to WiFi is kind of a deal killer. Will I use it in a couple months? Possibly, but only if I can jailbreak the iPhour to use FaceTime over 3G. Most people will probably try out video calling a few times, deem it a "gimmick" then mostly continue about their lives without video calls.

    Ewan MacLeod - Publisher, Mobile Industry Review (@ew4n)

    "I know it seems silly to point this out, but I've been using video calling to interact with my seven-week old son and my wife when I've been away from home. The biggest problem I find is that other people don't use it. It's an anathema to them, still, despite much of the Western World having the facility for years. I don't think this will change quickly. Apple's FaceTime advertising is certainly helping educate consumers on 'best practice' and with their seamless implementation, I would hope that it video calling will be come more widespread. But I think it'll take years, not months, before I'm doing more than one video call a week.

    I do about 5x more video calling on my desktop/laptop via Skype than I do on my mobile.

    So where I might do one video call a week on my mobile, I do at least five or more video calls from the desktop."

    Jessica Dolcourt - Sr. Associate Editor,CNET Reviews(@jdolcourt)

    "Video chatting is on the upswing, especially in the mobile space where high megapixel, front-facing cameras are becoming the new smartphone standard. Other phone manufacturers and app developers will follow suit one way or another. Apple’s FaceTime is only one example of what’s available now, but because it’s preloaded on the iPhone 4 and not a third-party app, Apple has effectively drawn attention to the video issue on its cultish, status symbol of a device in a way that third-party apps have not been able to do.

    With my immediate family living internationally, I do frequently video chat from the desktop. But you know what, if there were better, more reliable VoIP chat apps with clear, two-way video, I’d make a heck of a lot more overseas calls."

    Todd Haselton - Sr Editor, Mobile Burn (@robotodd)

    "I dont use video chat now and likely won't in two months, either. I think it could be compelling with a client such as Skype, if it connects video calling from computers and mobile alike. Otherwise i think voice calls and text messages are more efficient."

    Chris Ziegler - Mobile Editor, Engadget Mobile (@zpower)

    "I think the barrier that's stopped it from taking off is easy phone-to-PC bridging, personally. Phone-to-phone isn't always practical, and with FaceTime, of course, compatibility is about as limited as it can be."

     

    What about you? Do you use video chatting on your phone? Would you seek out and pay more for a phone with a front-facing camera and video calling software? What about from the desktop? Do you Skype? Do you like it, do you want it, do you even care? Let us know in the comments!

     

    Become a PhoneDog Fan on Facebook and don't forget to "Spin to Win!" today Know something we don't? E-mail us or post it in our forums


    Tags: , , ,

  • 22Jul

    Dell Windows Phone 7

    Microsoft's Windows Mobile was known for coming appearing on devices from several different manufacturers and, when it's released, Windows Phone 7 will be no different.  Microsoft's own Greg Sullivan, senior product manager for the company, confirmed to Pocket-lint that WP7 devices from Dell, Asus, LG, HTC, and Samsung will be hitting when the OS finally launches.  Sullivan wouldn't give up any release information beyond the vague "holidays" window.  He did mention a device called the LG Pacific, but refused to talk about the device further.

    The Windows Phone 7 news has been steadily flowing lately and, now that we know the manufacturers, we can begin dreaming up all of the possible WP7 handsets that we'll be seeing later this year.  It's pretty disappointing that we still don't have a solid release date, but I'm sure that once we get closer to the holiday season, we'll hear more from Microsoft on the situation.  Until then, we'll have to drool over device leaks like the one seen above from Engadget.

    Via Engadget, Pocket-lint

    Become a PhoneDog Fan on Facebook and don't forget to "Spin to Win!" today Know something we don't? E-mail us or post it in our forums


    Tags: , , ,

  • 22Jul

    AOL isn't a company we hear a lot of when it comes to the mobile space, but today the company is making waves with two new Android apps as well as an optimized HTML5 mobile homepage.  The first app gives quick access to many of the company's services, like Engadget and AIM, similar to Google's mobile app.  DailyFinance is the second app and, as the name implies, it gives access to stock information, news, etc.  Finally, AOL redesigned its mobile page to play nicely with phones by using HTML5.  David Temkin, AOL's Vice President of Mobile, had this to say on the apps and new mobile site:

    “Android has emerged as a top-tier smartphone platform … Today’s smartphones offer a completely different experience from the previous generation of WAP-based sites, and AOL will be taking full advantage of the possibilities these new devices can offer, both on the mobile web and in apps.”


    AOL may not be one of the first companies you think of when you think of mobile phones, but the company is certainly doing what it needs to make itself known.  The apps look good and could help raise interest in using AOL's services like Moviefone.  The new mobile page is also great, sporting a clean look that works well and loads quickly on mobile devices.  Now the company just needs to get consumers aware of their new products.

    Via IntoMobile

    Become a PhoneDog Fan on Facebook and don't forget to "Spin to Win!" today Know something we don't? E-mail us or post it in our forums


    Tags: , , ,

  • 22Jul

    Reflecting on last week, there’s a lot for Palm faithfuls to talk about.  First we learned that several smartphone top dogs were vying to purchase Palm, including Apple, Research In Motion and Google.  With all of the speculation about Palm’s future just a few short months ago and the simultaneous “phew” that many exhaled on news of HP’s plans, it looks like regardless of how things shook out, there was considerable interest in Palm and that it certainly would have had a future in the smartphone market.  All of this interest also shows that Palm, and webOS particularly, have recognized value that will hopefully finally translate with consumers through the new support of HP.  In my opinion, new market share success for Palm will all come down to the hardware of the next generation webOS smartphones, as well as marketing and distribution.  Palm has the operating system and HP has the retail prowess, but I’ll be waiting with bated breath to see how it all unfolds, which hopefully will not be much longer.

    Last week then shockingly closed with unexpected publicity from an unlikely source, Apple.  At Friday’s iPhone 4 press conference, Steve Jobs stated “we're pretty good at making software...other people are good at it too, like Palm...”.   

    The news of Apple’s warm fuzzies for Palm got even more interesting when Steve Wozniak offered yet another compliment to Palm.  In a separate interview by another source, when asked about ways to to improve data network reliability on the iPhone 4, Woz actually suggested getting a Palm.

    "If you can afford it, carry a second Verizon phone for backup.  Another option is to carry a Verizon mifi and rely on Skype on your iPhone.  I have used this mifi technique to rescue my own, and others', iPhones on occasion. If you buy a Verizon Palm Pre, you get free mifi on it so that is possible the best 'compromise' solution, to carry a Verizon Palm Pre along with your AT&T iPhone 4."  [Source: Mifieurope]

    Unable to really believe the above quote, I read it over and over countless times.  Now I can’t knock the iPhone, it is truly revolutionary.  But how can it be that an Apple co-founder uses something other than an iPhone?  Obviously the iPhone is his primary smartphone, but the fact that he admits to needing and using a backup - and a Pre Plus at that! - is outrageous.  For those of us that don’t have the luxury of carrying multiple phones and plans and others like myself, who can’t really stuff one more thing into our already overloaded diaper-carry-everything bag, is the iPhone 4 really the answer to which smartphone to purchase?

    So, in the midst of Antennagate, one of the biggest scandals to shake (or maybe just rumble) the iPhone empire, Apple offers not one but two strong compliments to the competition.  While I am beyond pleased by this turn of events, I just can’t comprehend it.  Does Apple genuinely appreciate Palm and actually feel comfortable enough to say it like it is?  Are they maybe trying to somehow knock other big competitors by only referring to Palm?  Or does Apple not even see Palm as a threat, so much so that the Steves can just throw out compounding compliments before millions of viewers and consumers all while the iPhone 4’s future hangs in the balance?  Am I being a cynic or am I just missing something?  

    Either way, any publicity is good publicity and getting kudos from Apple is about as good as it gets.  Maybe I am just too skeptical and Palm is like the little brother Apple never had.  As I have been saying since I purchased my Pre Plus, Palm clearly has something significant to add to the smartphone world.  Techies see it, other smartphone companies see it, and now Apple confirms it.  So when will the consumers out there catch on?

    Become a PhoneDog Fan on Facebook and don't forget to "Spin to Win!" today Know something we don't? E-mail us or post it in our forums


    Tags: , , ,

  • 22Jul

    iPad line

    Unsurprisingly, some Apple stores are still having trouble meeting demand for the iPhone 4 and iPad.  Currently, If your local store doesn't have the configuration of either device that you want, they will put your name and the product you want on a "Priority List."  Boy Genius Report has received a tip from an internal Apple source that said that the company is very interested in clearing out these lists, possibly by this weekend.  Some stores have reservations of between 500-1000 iPhone 4s and 250-750 iPads.

    To help move through the lists, the tipster has said that Apple is aiming for a "all hands on deck" approach this weekend, similar to when a major product launches.  Additionally, some stores may even open early on Sunday to help move iPads and iPhone 4s.  BGR believes that after all of the waiting lists have been cleared out, sales of iOS devices could total between 500,000 and 1,000,000 over the weekend.

    This move would definitely make sense for Apple.  They can make a big push to get more iOS devices into people's hands and clear out the iPhone 4 waiting list before the white model launches.  I'm surprised to hear that some stores are still having trouble keeping the iPad in stock almost four months after launch, but Apple's Q3 earnings report did say that the device was selling almost as well as all of its Mac computers.  Are any of you on a waiting list for an iPhone 4 or iPad?

    Via Boy Genius Report, image via CNET

    Become a PhoneDog Fan on Facebook and don't forget to "Spin to Win!" today Know something we don't? E-mail us or post it in our forums


    Tags: , , ,

  • 22Jul


    Slated for release during the holidays, Windows Phone 7 has gradually shown its face to the industry, and despite some negative press, most have been cautiously optimistic about the future of the mobile OS.  The optimism must extend to AT&T as well - citing a "trusted source," technology columnist and analyst Michael Gartenberg tweeted that AT&T plans to receive eight million units at launch.  To put it in perspective, that's almost three times more than the number of iPhone 4 devices sold to date, and as MobileCrunch points out, approximately one million times more than the number of KIN devices sold.

    Microsoft has been exceptionally careful about what they've shown the general public, and when they've shown it.  To that end, this shows that AT&T believes in the Windows Phone 7 platform - at least, they believe in it enough to sell eight million devices.

    Via MobileCrunch

    Become a PhoneDog Fan on Facebook and don't forget to "Spin to Win!" today Know something we don't? E-mail us or post it in our forums


    Tags: , , ,

« Previous Entries   

Recent Comments

  • Thanks for post. Nice to see such good ideas....
  • Nice post u have here :D Added to my RSS reader...
  • Hi there, I looked over your blog and it looks really goo...